Write to the booksellers
Gaston Cayrou
Le latin en N° 3
1953 1953.
Reference : 500067244
Bon état
Bookseller's contact details
Démons et Merveilles
M. Christophe Ravignot
contact@demons-et-merveilles.com
07 54 32 44 40
Payment mode
Sale conditions
Rapidité d'envoi Tous nos articles sont expédiés le jour même de la confirmation de la commande Soin de l'emballage Un soin particulier est apporté à l'emballage, vos objets voyagent en toute sécurité. A votre écoute Si toutefois un incident devait survenir lors de l'acheminement de votre paquet, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter, nous mettrons tout en oeuvre pour vous satisfaire, en vous proposant un retour, un remboursement ou toute autre soluton à votre convenance. Professionnalisme Les livres que nous vendons sont pour la plupart des livres anciens, nous tâchons d'être le plus objectif possible quant à leur état.
5 book(s) with the same title
Sefer Zurat ha-Erets... Sphaera mundi, describens figuram terrae dispositionemque orbium coelestium & motus stellarum, autore Rabi Abraham Hispano filio R. Haijae… Item arithmetica (Sefer ha-Mispar)... in numeris integris & fractis, a Rabi Elia [Mizrahi]... conscripta. Accesserunt... S. Munsteri annotationes marginales. Rarissime édition originale bilingue hébreu-latin du plus célèbre traité d’astronomie d’Abraham bar Hiyya.
Superbe exemplaire conservé dans sa reliure de l’époque en peau de truie estampée à froid sur ais de bois. Basel, H. Petri, 1546. 2 textes en 1 volume in-4 de : I/ (3) ff., (1) f.bl., 351 pp., (1) p. avec la marque ; II/ (4) ff. (sur 5, relié sans le titre latin de la 2e partie), (1) f.bl., 207 pp., (1) p. avec la marque. Hebrew and Roman letters, illustration: woodcut figures and diagrams. Reliure en peau de truie de l’époque estampée à froid sur ais de bois. Les plats sont ornés d’une plaque à froid avec une frise comportant des scènes bibliques en encadrement. Le plat supérieur est monogrammé et daté « I S 1558 ». Dos à nerfs comportant le titre manuscrit. Superbe reliure allemande de l’époque. 195 x 140 mm.
Rarissime édition originale bilingue hébreu-latin du plus célèbre traité d’astronomie d’Abraham bar Hiyya (1065-1136), un mathématicien, astronome et philosophe juif espagnol. Adams A-33 ; VD16 ZV-19 ; USTC 661378 ; STC German 1; Zinner 1891; Macclesfield 119; Burmeister, Münster 146; Houzeau & Lancaster 1217; IA 100.165; Steinschneider 673.3; Zinner 1891. Sphaera Mundi, printed with Mizrahi (Elijah) Arithmetica, translated by O. Schreckenfuchs, edited by Sebastian Munster, printed in Hebrew and Latin. “This beautifully printed volume, is both in its Hebrew and Latin parts, illustrated by neat Diagrams and Figures cut in wood; and subsequent to a Preface in Latin, gives us (underneath a short Hebrew Title) the following copious Latin Title […]. The above work of Rabbi Abraham is thus entered in the Bibliotheca Brittanica. Abraham R. Fil. Haijae, a native of Spain, and author of ‘Sphaera Mundi, Hebraice, cim versione Oswaldi Schreckenfuchsii, et Notis Sebastiani Munsteri’, Basil, 1546, 4to. The Device of Henry Petrus (the printer of this finely executed volume) appears at the end of both the Hebrew and Latin texts. The following extract from the ‘General Biography’ must necessarily be understood to designate the author of the ‘Sphaera Mundi’ notwithstanding the variation in spelling his Father’s name – ‘Abraham Ben Chaila, a Spanish Rabbi, in the 13th century, practiced Astrology, and assumed the character of a Prophet. He predicted the coming of the Messiah, and fixed for the time of his advent, the year 1358, but fortunately died in 1303 (fifty-five years before the time when his prediction was to be fulfilled). He is also said to have written a Treatise on the Figure of the Earth in Hebrew and Latin, which was published at Basel in 1546, 4to.” (A descriptive catalogue of books in the Library of John Holmes). The author, often known as Savasorda, wrote a treatise on practical geometry, which contains the earliest account of Arabic algebra written in Europe. This work deals with astronomy and geography. Il était connu sous plusieurs autres noms, dont Savasordia, Abraham Judaeus et également Abraham Hispano comme dans le présent ouvrage. Il comporte aussi « Compendium arithmetices » par Elija Orientali, également en hébreu et en latin, et « Quos Libros Osvvaldus » par Erasme Oswald Schreckenfuchs. The treatise on arithmetic by Elijah Mizrahi (c. 1540-1526), an important figure in Ottoman Jewry, was first published in Constantinople in 1533. L’ouvrage, imprimé en hébreu et en latin, comporte des commentaires et des explications de Sebastian Münster. Il est orné de nombreuses gravures sur bois et diagrammes dans le texte ainsi que de la marque de l’imprimeur répétée à la fin de chacune des deux versions hébreu et latine. Superbe exemplaire conservé dans sa reliure de l’époque en peau de truie estampée à froid sur ais de bois.
latin et la litt rature n o-latine au XIXe si cle. Pratiques et repr sentations
, Brepols, 2020 Paperback, v + 299 pages, Size:160 x 240 mm, Languages: French, English, Italian. ISBN 9789492771322.
Summary Le XIXe si cle est connu comme l' poque o l'essor des nationalismes et des langues nationales en Europe a d finitivement rel gu le latin aux marges du monde social. Or, si le latin conna t alors un ind niable d clin, il n'en demeure pas moins tout un temps une langue importante pour les nations modernes. Le pr sent volume tudie les manifestations d'une tradition linguistique pluris culaire qui ne s'est pas teinte l'aube de la modernit . Fruit d'une collaboration internationale, il rassemble des contributions portant sur diff rents pays d'Europe occidentale et centrale. Les auteurs retracent l'histoire du latin au XIXe si cle, s'interrogent aussi bien sur les raisons de son succ s que sur celles de son d clin et pr tent une attention particuli re aux aspects th matiques et stylistiques des textes. La litt rature n o-latine, qui n'est pas indiff rente au surgissement des romantismes europ ens, est pass e la loupe. L'ouvrage met galement en vidence l'inflexion que l'inspiration latine antique a pu donner une oeuvre po tique en langue moderne. TABLE OF CONTENTS Christophe Bertiau, "Le latin, une mati re ?bourgeoise?? Sur le d clin du latin dans l'enseignement l' poque contemporaine" The article refutes the received idea of Latin being a "bourgeois" school subject. It states on the contrary that the political and economic rise of the bourgeoisie accounts for the decline of Latin in secondary education during the last two centuries. Although Latin kept its dominant position in the curriculums throughout the nineteenth century, its supremacy was increasingly challenged by certain exponents of the bourgeoisie, who demanded school learning to be more markedly connected to the professional world. Jan Spoelder, "The decline of Latin as the academic language at Dutch universities and its consequences for education in Latin" In the eighteenth century, Latin lost its status as the universal scholarly language in countries like France, Germany and Britain. However, the Royal Decree of 1815 provided that Latin remained the exclusive academic language in the Kingdom of the Netherlands. More and more tension arose between maintaining classical educational ideals and the with to use the vernacular. Only when the Act on Higher Education was passed in 1876, this meant in practice the end of the mandatory use of Latin at Dutch universities. This new situation also ended the raison d' tre of the Latin school, the kind of education that had prepared for university entrance in the towns of the Dutch Republic and the later Kingdom. This type of school was reorganised to meet the altered requirements of the modern time under the name of Gymnasium. This school, with compulsory Greek and Latin, is still flourishing magnificently at the moment. Patrizia Paradisi, "Il latino nelle cerimonie ufficiali del Regno d'Italia, dall'Universit di Bologna al Campidoglio a Roma (Gandino, Albini e Pascoli)" Patrizia Paradisi stresses the significance Latin displayed for the official ceremonies of the Kingdom of Italy at the time of Giovanni Battista Gandino, Giuseppe Albini and Giovanni Pascoli. It thus appears how Latin was used to compose speeches, letters, an inscription for a medal, a hymn or a journal on the occasion of various ceremonies. Giacomo Dalla Piet , "L'evoluzione stilistica del latino all'interno della curia romana nel secolo XIX" Giacomo Dalla Piet sketches how the Latin style of encyclical letters developed during the nineteenth century. He interprets the adoption of a high style, which was to become increasingly Ciceronian, under the pontificate of Leo XIII as testament to the latter's universalist project and new way of conceiving papacy. ?ime Demo, "Stubborn persistence at the outskirts of the West: Latin in nineteenth-century Croatia" The article gives an insight into the status of Latin in nineteenth-century Croatia. Latin retained there until the mid-century a decided importance as a means of international communication, as a political instrument, as a medium of instruction or as a literary language. However, Croatian tended towards more and more superseding Latin in its uses. As a result, Latin was hardly ever used outside Church and education in the second half of the century. Neven Jovanovi?, "Two gentlemen-translators from nineteenth-century Dubrovnik" The author analyses the Latin translations of Antonio Sivrich and Blasius Ghetaldi, two poets from Dubrovnik. He compares how both translators worked and reflects upon the reasons why they rendered into Latin Italian sonnets and anacreontic poems (Sivrich) or Ivan Gunduli?'s Croatian epos Osman (Ghetaldi). Svorad Zavarsk , "?Et meus vere paradisus audit: mandra, poesis?: The poetry of Antonius Faber" Svorad Zavarsk presents the work of the neo-Latin poet from Bratislava Antonius Faber. He affirms that the main interest of A.?Faber's little classical poetry is its originality. This poetry can be seen as a compromise between traditional neo-Latin poetry and the romantic revival. It epitomises quite good the linguistic situation of Hungary at that time, where the national language was more and more often preferred to Latin. Florian Schaffenrath, "Antonio Mazzetti's neo-Latin epic poem on Emperor Ferdinand I (1838)" Florian Schaffenrath tackles a panegyric (gratulatio) addressed by Antonio Mazzetti to Emperor Ferdinand?I and examines its reception. He highlights the enthusiasm this poem motivated by current political affairs elicited, even though Latin verses no longer were in fashion. Antonino Zumbo, "Scrivere una novella romantica in versi latini: il Polymetron di Giovanni Andrea Vinacci" The article deals with the Polymetron, a romantic short story written in Latin verses by Andrea Vinacci. The story displays a Byronian inspiration and is located in the nineteenth-century Italian independence wars. Both these characteristics suggest that far from a mere formal dialogue with the Ancients has neo-Latin literature always attempted to stay in tune with its time. Romain Jalabert, "Des vers latins romantiques, en France" Romain Jalabert shows that a whole part of nineteenth-century French neo-Latin poetry was opened up to Romanticism. Original Latin poems inspired by Romanticism and Latin translations of poems in modern languages were no oddities. Schools played a leading role in this new tendency. Alphonse de Lamartine enjoyed great success as a source of inspiration for Latin poets. Dirk Sacr , "Colonel William Siddons Young (1832-1901) as a Latin poet" Dirk Sacr presents the life and work of the atypical British neo-Latin poet Colonel William Siddons Young (1832-1901). Young was an army officer in the Bengal civil service. Although some Latinists considered him as the greatest living Latin poet, his Latin verses display imperfections and he rapidly fell into oblivion after his death. But because of his atypical profile, he could serve the cause of Latin as a universal language. Through the figure of Young, this article provides us with an overview of the evolution of living Latin in the late nineteenth century. Marie-France David-de Palacio, "Un epigrammaton liber fin-de-sie cle: les ?latineries? de Jean Richepin" This contribution demonstrates on the basis of Jean Richepin's "Latineries" how a writer can breath new life into his own poetic language by imitating ancient authors. Whereas the style models on the epigrams of Roman Antiquity, and more specifically of Martial, the content exhibits a "Gallic" character.
Latin in Byzantium I. Late Antiquity and Beyond
, Brepols, 2019 Hardback, 564 pages, Size:155 x 245 mm, Illustrations:22 b/w, Languages: English, French, Italian. ISBN 9782503584928.
Summary 'Latin in Byzantium' explores the linguistic competence, cultural identity, and transmission of Latin texts in the 'noua Roma' between the fourth and the ninth centuries. Drawing together texts from a number of fields (e.g., law, grammar, religion, and tactics) and across a range of different forms (e.g., palaeographic, epigraphic, and papyrological), this important project provides scholars for the first time with an in-depth knowledge of both the Latin-speaking milieux in Byzantium, and of the contexts in which Latin was used. Crucially, the ancient sources studied in this volume are also analysed in their broader political and sociological context, providing rich material for study across different disciplines and making this volume an important resource for closing the gaps between literary and non-literary texts, history, and philology. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Rhomaika: Una introduzione - Guglielmo Cavallo General Framework Desuetudine longa? subeunt verba latina : The Transition From Late Antique to Medieval Byzantium and the Fall of Latin - Luigi Silvano Latin in Byzantium: Different Forms of Linguistic Contact - Alessandro Garcea Latin in the Empire: Texts and People La pratique du latin dans l' gypte de l'Antiquit tardive - Jean-Luc Fournet The Use of Latin in the Context of Multilingual Monastic Communities in the East - Claudia Rapp Writing Latin in Late Antique Constantinople - Gabriel Nocchi Macedo The Laws of the Language and the Language of the Laws La lingua degli ??????. Conoscenza e uso del latino nell'Oriente greco di iv secolo attraverso l'opera di Libanio - Andrea Pellizzari Asymmetric Exchange: Latin Speakers Learning Greek and Greek Speakers Learning Latin in Late Antiquity. On the Evidence of Grammars and Bilingual Texts - Juan Signes Codo er L'insegnamento di Prisciano - Michela Rosellini - Elena Spangenberg Yanes Sur un silence de Jean le Lydien - Marc Baratin Justinianus Latinograecus. Language and Law during the Reign of Justinian - Thomas Ernst van Bochove Latin as a Medium at the Service of the Power Le rituel des acclamations : de Rome "Byzance" - Fr d rique Biville L'univers grec et latin d'un po te africain : Corippe et Byzance - Vincent Zarini Latin Inscriptions in (Early) Byzantium - Andreas Rhoby Latin Texts as Sources La traduction du latin en grec Byzance : un aper u g n ral - Bruno Rochette Modelli latini per poemi greci? Sulla possibile influenza di autori latini sulla poesia epica tardoantica - Gianfranco Agosti Latin and the Chronicon Paschale - Christian Gastgeber Sulla conoscenza del latino nell'Oriente romano nel periodo tra Maurizio ed Eraclio (582-641): il caso degli storici-funzionari e di Giovanni di Antiochia - Umberto Roberto Latinismi e cultura letteraria nei frammenti di Pietro Patrizio: per un'indagine sul De cerimoniis e sugli Excerpta Historica Constantiniana - Laura Mecella Latin Literature in Johannes Malalas's Chronicle - Olivier Gengler Appunti per un lessico grecolatino tardoantico: la traduzione latina di Gregorio di Nazianzo trasmessa dal Laur. S. Marco 584 - Alessandro CaponeLatin Vocabulary Transmitted across Space and Time On the Use of Latin Legal Terminology in the Byzantine Legal Treatise De actionibus - Jos -Domingo Rodr guez Mart n Per lo studio dei rapporti tra istituzioni di giustiniano e libri basilici - Massimo Miglietta Latinit cach e Constantinople (VIe - moiti XIIIe si cles) - Peter Schreiner I latinismi nella lingua greca moderna - Johannes Niehoff-Panagiotidis Index of Names Index of Places
Latin in Byzantium III: Post-Byzantine Latinitas. Latin in Post-Byzantine Scholarship (15th -19th Centuries)
, Brepols, 2021 Hardback, 490 pages, Size:155 x 245 mm, Illustrations:14 b/w, 8 tables b/w., 2 maps b/w, Language(s):English, Latin, Greek. ISBN 9782503589947.
Summary This volume aims at filling a major gap in international literature concerning the knowledge of the Latin language and literature by Post-Byzantine scholars from the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries. Most of them, immigrants to the West after the Fall of Byzantium, harmoniously integrated into their host countries, practiced and perfected their knowledge of the Latin language and literature, excelled in arts and letters and, in many cases, managed to obtain civil, political and clerical offices. They wrote original poetic and prose works in Latin, for literary, scholarly and/or political purposes. They also translated Greek texts into Latin, and vice versa. The contributors to this volume explore the multifaceted aspects of the knowledge of the Latin language and literature by these scholars. Among the many issues addressed in the volume are: the reasons that urged Post-Byzantine scholars to compose Latin works and disseminate Ancient Greek works to the West and Latin texts to the East, their audience, the fate of their projects, and their relations among them and with Western scholars. In the contents of the volume one can find well known Post-Byzantine scholars such as Bessarion or Isidore of Kiev, as well as lesser known authors like Ioannis Gemistos, Nikolaos Sekoundinos and others. Hence, hereby is provided a canon of scholars who, albeit Greek, are considered essentially as representatives of Neo-Latin literature, along with others who, through their translations, contributed to the rapprochement - literary and political - of East and West. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface List of Contributors List of Abbreviations Introductory Note A. Introduction Dimitrios Nikitas, An Overview of Post-Byzantine Latinitas B. Greek Studies in the West and Latin Studies in the East in the Post-Byzantine Period and Early Modern Greek Period Christina Abenstein, Treason, Ambition, and Hardship on the Cultural Entanglement of George of Trebizond's Revised Draft of his Translation of Saint Basil Garyfallia Athanasiadou, Reforming a Translation: Nicholas Secundinus's Contribution to the Revised Translation of Arrian's Anabasis of Alexander Made by Bartolomeo Facio Malika Bastin-Hammou, Aemilius Portus, between Greek Scholar and Latin Humanist: Some Relexions on Aemilius Portus's Edition of Aristophanes (1607) Federica Ciccolella, When Cicero Meets Hermogenes: The Defence of Greek Studies in Quattrocento Italy Ioannis Deligiannis, The Diffusion of the Latin Translations of Greek Texts Produced by Late and Post-Byzantine Scholars and Printed from the Mid-Fifteenth to Late Sixteenth Century Michael Malone-Lee, The Latin Translations of Cardinal Bessarion Andreas ?. Michalopoulos & Charilaos ?. Michalopoulos, Modern Greek Translations of Latin Poetic Quotations in the ??????? ????????? (Theatrum Politicum) Vasileios Pappas, The Translation of Justin's Epitome of Trogus by Ioannis Makolas (1686) C. Latin Texts in the Post-Byzantine and Early Modern Greek Period: Theology and Religion, History and Literature, Politics, Ideology and National Identity Ovanes Akopyan, Latin Studies and Greek Scholars in Early Modern Russia Byard Benett, Augustine's Theology as a Resource for Reconciling the Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox Churches in the Post-Byzantine Period: Maximus Margunius's Greek and Latin Works on the Procession of the Holy Spirit Ilias Giarenis, Leonardo Bruni and Bessarion: Two Scholars, Two Languages, and Two Versions of Liberty in the Fifteenth Century Nikolaos E. Karapidakis, Latinitas or Romanitas Nostra: Latin Culture in the Seven Islands under the Venetian Domination (XIXth-XIXth century) Han Lamers, What's in a Name? Naming the 'Post-Byzantines' in Renaissance Italy (and Beyond) Nikolaos Mavrelos, Latinitas Graecorum: Latin Language Used by Greeks and Greek Identity in Seventeenth-and-Eighteenth-Century Texts Lorenzo Miletti, Between Herodotus and the Poison Maiden. Laonikos Chalkokondyles and the Death of King Ladislaus of Durazzo Sophia Papaioannou, Exempla Virtutis and Augustinian Ethics in De Statu Hominis by Leonardus, Archbishop of Mytilene Theodosios Pylarinos & Vaios Vaiopoulos, Life and Work of a ???????????? Corfiot: Antonio Rodostamo (???????? ??????????) Konstantinos Staikos, Eugenios Voulgaris's Edition of Virgil's Aeneid Raf Van Rooy, A Latin Defence of Early Modern Greek Culture: Alexander Helladius's Status Praesens (1714) and its Linguistic Arguments Index of names Index of manuscripts
Anacreontis teii antiquitissimi poëtae Lyrici Odae, ab Helia Andre Latinae factae. - [ANDRÉ'S SEMINAL LATIN TRANSLATION OF THE ANACREONTEA]
Lutetiae (i.e. Paris), Robert Stephanum (i.e. Robert Estienne) & Guillaume Morel, 1556. Small 8vo. Lovely newer full marbled paper binding with gilt leather title-label to spine (Jens E. Hansen, Aarhus). Light brownspotting to a few leaves and somne leaves towards the end with inkspotting at outer blank margin. Early neat handwritten marginal annotations throughout. A lovely copy. 54 pp.
Scarce second edition of Elie André’s seminal Latin translation of the Anacreontea – the first complete - which itself is a classic in the history of classical literature. It came to directly influence all later readings of Anacreon. In 1554, Henri Estienne II published the seminal editio princeps of Anacreon, which is no less than an outright Renaissance sensation, causing the “Anacreaonta” to become the most influential “ancient” Greek poetic text during the Renaissance, initiating a poetic revolution in Europe. Simultaneously with this editio princeps, Henri Estienne published his own Latin translation of it, which constitutes the first translation into Latin. Merely a year later, in 1555, Elie André extremely important translation of the Anacreaontea appeared, in 1555, printed by Thomas Richard. This translation included additional Odes not in the Estienne edition and was thus the first complete Latin translation of the “Anacreontia”. The following year, 1556, Robert Estienne II published his first work, namely a second edition of the original Greek Anacreontea that Henri Estienne had published in 1554. Silmultaneously, Robert Estienne republished Elie André’s Latin translation, which was published separately, but which is often found together with the 1556 second edition of the Greek Anacreontea. “The first full translation of CA was again in Latin. It was published by the humanist Elie André (1509-1587) from Bordeaux, who was friendly with the Parisian circle around the Pléiade. André’s translation appeared less than a year after Estienne’s edition and comprised the Latin translation only, without the Greek text. In a way, this can be taken as a signal that the Latin tradition was coming into its own. Accordingly, André makes some bolder choices in his translation, which already shows in his first lines (see Aiijr): Cantare nunc Atridas, Nunc expetesso Cadmum: Testudo vero nervis Solum refert Amorem (…). In classical Latin, the verb expetessere is used only by Plautus (and it is extremely rare in postclassical Latin). This brings a somewhat odd ring of comedy to the poem. Here, and in a number of other places, the translator wishes to strike his readers with an unusual turn of phrase or by some sort of amplification. He does not just imitate ‘Anacreon’, but also competes with him (as arguably with Estienne’s translation). André’s willingness to adapt the original text shows also in a certain moralistic tendency not otherwise seen in Latin translations. On the one hand, he openly and avowedly changes the text when it comes to unequivocal references to homosexuality: in CA 12 (10).8-10 (τ? µευ καλ?ν ?νε?ρων […] ?φ?ρπασας Β?θυλλον “Why from my sweet dreams […] have you snatched away Bathyllus?”), for instance, he replaces Bathyllus with a puella (Cur mane somnianti / Ista loquacitate / Mihi eripis puellam?),… in CA 29 (17).1-2 (Γρ?φε µοι Β?θυλλον ο?τω / τ?ν ?τα?ρον ?ς διδ?σκω, “Paint for me thus Bathyllus, my lover, just as I instruct you”) he simply suppresses the word ?τα?ρον, “lover” (Mihi pinge sic Bathyllum / ... Estienne’s translation is: Meos Bathyllum amores, / Ut te docebo pinge). Here, André proceeds in a way similar to the original Neo-Latin Anacreontics, in which homosexual love simply does not occur. On the other hand, André makes generous use of a metatextual element which is less conspicuous than his changes, but is even more extensive and significant. He includes a considerable number of passages in quotation marks and thus identifies them as sort of sententiae. In CA 4 (32), for instance, lines 1-6 describe how the poet wishes to lie down on myrtles, drink, and have Eros as his wine steward. This description of a specific setting is followed by some more general lines about the brevity of life, which André includes in quotation marks (lines 7- 10): “Cita nanque currit aetas, / Rota ceu voluta currus. / Sed et ossibus solutis / Iaceam cinis necesse est” (“For hurried life runs along just like a rolling wheel, but I shall soon lie, a bit of dust from crumbling bones”). The focus of this quotation technique is on lines concerned with the transitory nature of life, the uncertainness of tomorrow, and the futility of riches. By marking out such lines as sententiae, André distinguishes Anacreon the philosopher from Anacreon the drinker and lover and contributes to a larger discourse about the morality of the poet and his poems. While opinions in antiquity were often critical of Anacreon’s morals, ‘Anacreon’s’ large flock of modern imitators was united to defend their hero’s virtue. From Estienne’s preface onwards they usually referred to Plato’s Phaedrus 235c, where Socrates calls Anacreon “wise” (σοφ?ς) in matters concerned with Eros. In the 18th century, Anacreon, the philosopher, could even turn into a key-image of enligthened discourses. André’s identification of sententiae in ‘Anacreon’ prepared for this development and could have had a direct influence on it since his translation was widely read until well into the 18th century. The Latin translations of Estienne and André soon became classics in themselves and were the most successful ones in the early modern period.” (Tilg: Neo-Latin Anacreontic Poetry. Its Shape(s) and Its Significance, 214. Pp. 177-78). Brunet: I:250 Renouard: I:(161).
